Throughout my time in high school many literary
analysis assignments have been given to me. Those assignments fall into two categories.
The first category is for literary
analyses done on assigned books to read and the second category is for literary
analyses done on books I got to choose.
I generally disliked the assignments in the first category.
The books that the teachers choose tended to be American literature classics,
which usually do not appeal to me. Although they lack appeal, they do not lack in
the number of academic writings about them. For these assignments, I usually
read the book hastily so I could be done with it. Because of this, I would rely
heavily on the critiques I read to develop deeper opinions about the book. None
of the books were particularly challenging for me academically but they were challenging
for me in the sense that it took more effort to make myself given assignments
the effort required. Some examples of books I had to read and write on are The
Great Gatsby, Of Mice and Men, To Kill a Mockingbird, and The Scarlet Letter.
The assignments in the second category, on the other
hand, I usually enjoyed. For these assignments, the teacher would either let
the class choose from a long list of books or allow the class to choose any
book they want, within limits, and with their approval. For these assignments,
the downside was that there were usually limited amounts of academic writing
about them. To combat that, because of my interest in the books, I formed more opinions
and thoughts on the book by myself and used sources more sparingly. These books
could be challenging if I wanted them to be.
Overall I have mixed feelings about writing literary
analyses.
No comments:
Post a Comment